Harlots Parlour

The Sex Industry Blog – For Media Enquiries please call us on 020 7175 0180 or email dearharlot@gmail.com

Landmark ruling legalizes brothels in Ontario

Good news from Canada where the Ontario court has affectedly decriminalised indoor prostitution. The landmark decision that could legalise brothels through out Canada if ratified by the supreme court will not take effect for a year to allow the Canadian government to amend present legislation. The law does not legalise street sex workers however which has dismayed some campaigners. This positive move however is important because it is not based on moral considerations but upon evidence which supported the claims by sex workers that the law deliberately made sex work dangerous by denying sex workers the most basic human rights.

This is the news report and an article from the Globe and Mail reporting the land mark decision.Read article with links “HERE”.

Monday, March 26, 2012

Kirk Makin, Justice Reporter

Landmark ruling legalizes brothels in Ontario

Left to right sex worker advocate Terri-Jean Bedford raises her arms in victory during a press conference in Toronto, Ont. Monday, March 26, 2012.

Ontario,ÄöaÑa¥s top court has legalized brothels in a ruling that came out today.
Kevin Van Paassen/The Globe and Mail

Ontario’s highest court has legalized brothels in a sweeping decision that condemned current prostitution laws for adding to the hazards of a highly dangerous profession.

The Ontario Court of Appeal allowed the Crown just one victory, ruling that communicating for the purposes of prostitution will remain illegal.

The landmark decision is binding on Ontario courts and sets up a final showdown at the Supreme Court of Canada next fall or in early 2013.

Ontario Attorney-General John Gerretsen said on Monday that he intends to discuss appealing the decision with his federal counterparts. “Our main concern is that people feel safe in their communities, feel safe in their homes, and this kind of issue may very well need legislative action,” he said.

The five-judge appellate panel said unanimously that prostitutes may set up brothels and hire staff to protect them. They said that it is senseless to have a law that compels prostitutes to work in dangerous isolation, given that prostitution itself is legal.

The judges also explicitly rejected a Crown argument that prostitutes make an informed decision to enter a dangerous trade, saying that prostitutes deserve as much protection as other citizens who work in “dangerous, but legal, enterprises.”

However, the court majority — Mr. Justice David Doherty, Mr. Justice Marc Rosenberg and Madam Justice Kathryn Feldman — salvaged the communication provision on the basis that it has kept neighbourhoods free of organized crime, drugs, noise and unwanted solicitations.

They played down arguments from prostitution activists that those it hurts most are marginalized street prostitutes who work in the shadows and must assess potential clients hastily.

Mr. Justice James MacPherson and Madame Justice Eleanore Cronk took sharp issue with the majority on the point, arguing that the communication provision significantly worsens the plight of street prostitutes.

“The violence faced by street prostitutes across Canada is, in a word, overwhelming,” they said. “One does not need to conjure up the face of Robert Pickton to know that this is true.”

The brothel ruling takes effect in a year. However, as of April 25, prostitutes can engage bodyguards. The court remodelled the pimping provision to target only those who live off the avails of prostitution “in circumstances of exploitation.”

The Sex Professionals of Canada immediately urged Ontario municipalities to begin discussing licensing provisions that will ensure health and safety of brothel workers and their clients.

Municipalities are expected to create a patchwork of regulation. Many, such as Niagara Falls, already license body-rub parlours. About 40 workers are employed in the city’s four licensed parlours. Toronto has 25 body-rub parlours and 482 licensed workers.

Eddie Francis, mayor of Windsor, Ont., said his planning staff are looking at zoning issues that isolate brothels from schools and family neighbourhoods without creating red-light districts.

Meanwhile, police forces are split on the logic and propriety of continuing “sweeps” of body-rub parlours in search of prostitutes and their clients.

“We stopped doing sweeps after the last decision and told our people that if there were problems, there are other laws they could use to deal with them,” said Toronto Police Service spokesman Mark Pugash. “We see little reason to change that.”

However, York Regional Police Chief Eric Jolliffe said that his force “continues to be bound by the laws that exist today and our obligation is to uphold the law as it is now.”

Prostitution activists hailed Monday’s decision as a historic victory.

“Six out of six judges so far have concluded that the law does not work and is hurting people,” said York University law professor Alan Young, the lawyer for the women who launched the constitutional challenge.

Valerie Scott, one of the litigants, said that prostitutes have a sense of belonging for the first time. “I feel like a debutante,” she said. “I feel like a citizen.”

Ms. Scott said that brothels have always existed in the shadows. “There is a brothel on every block in every city, and there always has been,” she said.

Nikki Thomas, executive director of SPOC, told reporters that prostitutes will be normal citizens who file income taxes, purchase investments and quietly go about their work. “We are not going to have fire and brimstone and sex workers raining down from the sky,” she said.

The Court of Appeal noted on Monday that Parliament is not precluded from enacting new prostitution laws provided they do not heighten the danger to prostitutes.

With reports from Karen Howlett and Anna Mehler Paperny

About Douglas Fox

4 comments on “Landmark ruling legalizes brothels in Ontario

  1. Pingback: Toronto’s Safer Stroll Program Teaches Prostitutes « Mindful Consideration

  2. stephenpaterson
    28 March, 2012

    The real angle on this, Douglas, is that the Canadian Charter of rights and freedoms that enables this challenge was granted to Canadians (but not us mere British) by Westminster’s Canada Act 1980. Furthermore, the Tories were in charge at the time (the blessed Margaret, methinks).

    So Westminster is happy to allow Canadians to challenge these Westminster-inspired laws + have them struck down in the courts, but not the likes of UK citizens.

    Ironic, no? And more than a touch hypocritical?

  3. Douglas Fox
    30 March, 2012

    Sadly that is governments for you whatever their political make up. Similarly Tony Blaire and his motley crew granted the USA rights of extradition over UK citizens that were not rescinded. The result is that UK subjects who have broken no laws in the UK are being deported to face nonsensical charges in the USA. Fairness is not something that the UK parliament is noted for sadly.

  4. Pingback: Employment and Franchise Opportunities – Immediate Openings for Prostitutes and Pimps « CITIZEN.BLOGGER.1984+ GUNNY.G BLOG.EMAIL

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


This entry was posted on 27 March, 2012 by in Uncategorized.
%d bloggers like this: