Harlots Parlour

The Sex Industry Blog – For Media Enquiries please call us on 020 7175 0180 or email dearharlot@gmail.com

A VICTORY FOR JUSTICE

Wonderful news….our very best wishes to Claire Finch from all at Harlots Parlour.

Dear Friends,

We wanted to let you know right away the fantastic news that Claire Finch was found not guilty of brothel keeping! The jury of 8 men and 4 women was out for just an hour and a half and the verdict was unanimous! There’s been lots of press interest, including The Guardian, The Times and Look East (local TV). We’ll send round a detailed report soon; in the meantime, this is the quick comment we did for the press, followed by the Press Release we issued before her case started.

Press comment:

Today in Luton Crown Court Claire Finch was found not guilty of a criminal charge of keeping a brothel! The jury, in line with public opinion, refused to criminalise Ms Finch for working together with friends from her own home for safety.

This malicious prosecution was motivated by a moral crusade and financial incentives for the police. Since Proceeds of Crime legislation was introduced, police are able to keep any money resulting from raids.

This not guilty verdict greatly strengthens the case for prostitution to be decriminalised so that women are able to work more safely together as in New Zealand.

Press release . . . .

SUPPORT CLAIRE FINCH.
SUPPORT SEX WORKERS´ RIGHT TO SAFETY.
Ms Claire Finch is facing brothel keeping charges and a prison sentence because she prioritised safety by working with friends at her home.

She is appearing at

Luton Crown Court, Monday 26 April, 9.30

This prosecution is part of a moral crusade which is driving the sex industry underground and women into more danger. It is not in the public interest.

Ms Finch says: “My main thing is safety. It’s not safe to work on your own. With two of us you had back up, you had camaraderie.”

In order to ensure safety, Ms Finch worked in shifts with three other women. There was never a time when one woman was left on her own. Since she was raided Ms Finch has been forced to work alone.

On 19 November 2008, 20 uniformed police officers from Kempston Economic Crime Unit, kicked in Ms Finch’s front door and searched every room in the house including Ms Finch’s personal belongings, taking £700 from her purse that had been put aside to pay the mortgage. Her laptop computer, mobile phone, driving licence and passport were also taken. No receipt was given.

Since Proceeds of Crime legislation (reinforced by the Policing and Crime Act), raids and prosecutions against women working from premises have escalated. Police and prosecutors have a vested interest: the police keep 25% of any assets confiscated both at the time and from subsequent prosecutions (50% in some areas); the Crown Prosecution Service keeps another 25%; and the Inland Revenue the rest. Even if no one is charged, the money is rarely returned. Women who have worked for years to put money aside lose not only their livelihood but their home, car, life savings, jewellery, etc. This theft by law enforcement is the worst form of pimping.

The CPS is supposed to bear in mind public interest considerations when considering charges. Ms Finch’s situation contradicts every one of them.

Public interest considerations for brothel keeping charges are:

To encourage prostitutes to find routes out of prostitution and to deter those who create the demand for it
A criminal conviction is the biggest obstacle to leaving prostitution.

To keep prostitutes off the street to prevent annoyance to members of the public
Ms Finch’s neighbours have no complaints and are coming to court to support her. Closing down premises drives women onto the street where it is ten times more dangerous to work.

To prevent people leading or forcing others into prostitution
All the women were working consensually and independently. There was no force, coercion, violence or trafficking.

To penalise those who organise prostitutes and make a living from their earnings.
There was no profiteering. Everyone worked collectively and shared expenses.

Generally, the more serious the incident, the more likely a prosecution will be required
While time and money are going into prosecuting Ms Finch, the investigation of rape and other violence continues to be downgraded. Public opinion opposes women being criminalised for working collectively and consensually.

The age of the prostitute and the position of those living off the earnings will be relevant
All the women working with Ms Finch were over forty, mature women able “to make their own minds up. They’re not being hoodwinked.” Ms Finch has said that as a mother, working with inexperienced younger women “would not sit morally well with me.”

For working collectively in a safe non-exploitative way, Ms Finch faces losing her home and a prison sentence of up to seven years. The laws which allow such prosecutions must be abolished and prostitution must be decriminalised. Safety comes first.

Contact English Collective of Prostitutes 020 7482 2496 ecp@allwomencount.net

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Information

This entry was posted on 30 April, 2010 by in Uncategorized.
%d bloggers like this: